MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414740373 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.452

B-054 The impact of hemolysis on lipase result: Does it clinically matter?

2025· article· en· W4414740373 on OpenAlexaff
Josh Raizman, Janet R. Zhou, Andrea Kunst, Fahed Elian, Miranda Brun, Yury Butorin, Lawrence de Koning, Samantha Logan, Isolde Seiden Long, Heather A. Paul, Allison A. Venner, Albert K.Y. Tsui

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsCochraneCalgary Laboratory ServicesProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthRed Deer PolytechnicUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryMD Precision (Canada)Alberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipaseHemolysisTriacylglycerol lipaseHemoglobinLysisAnalyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Roche Diagnostics recently lowered the hemolysis index (HI) interference threshold for lipase from 1000 (10 g/L) to 100 (1 g/L) hemoglobin, but there was limited supporting data communicated to support this change. This large threshold decrease significantly increases the sensitivity to interference for the lipase assay, potentially requiring result reporting changes that would slow laboratory workflow and impact result interpretation. To verify the new HI claim, we performed an interference study by targeting clinically relevant lipase concentrations. Methods Five lipase concentrations of residual lithium heparin plasma samples (36-227 U/L, n=3-5) were spiked with increasing concentrations of hemoglobin prepared from lysed red blood cells (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12 g/L). Lipase was measured in triplicate and HI results were measured in singleton on a Roche Cobas Pro c503 instrument. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Interference was calculated as the absolute and percent differences from the 0 g/L control. Interference was compared against the allowable total error (ATE) from various sources: 1) 12 U/L if <60 U/L or 20% if =60 U/L (RCPA), 2) 12.9% (EFLM), 3) 30% (CAP), and 4) 8 U/L if <40 U/L or 20% if =40 U/L (IQMH). Results At 1 g/L hemoglobin, the HI was 95±4, and yielded a 0.4-1.0% difference from baseline across all lipase concentrations. At the lowest lipase concentration group (38±2 U/L), results were falsely elevated starting at 3 g/L hemoglobin (HI=289 ± 18) when ELFM and IQMH ATE were used, while no difference was found when RCPA and CAP ATE were used up to 12 g/L hemoglobin (HI=1171±22). At other lipase concentrations, differences were all within ATE limits from all sources. Conclusion Hemolysis affected lipase results in a lipase concentration-dependent manner with an analytically significant impact found only when lipase concentration was <40 U/L. The clinical impact is minimal at this concentration as this is well within the normal reference interval for lipase. No changes to the hemolysis rules on the instrument were implemented. This study highlights the importance of verifying manufacturer claims and assessing change impact at a clinical level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207