MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414740792 · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.553

B-159 Four Years of Ottawa Hospital Outpatient Chemistry Data Transformed into Seasonally Adjusted Intrapatient Biological, Analytical and Preanalytical Variation

2025· article· en· W4414740792 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jialin Qiu, Christopher R. McCudden, George S. Cembrowski

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of EdmontonOttawa HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeasonalitySeparation (statistics)Variation (astronomy)Linear regressionLimits of agreementReference values

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The European Federation for Laboratory Medicine has conducted series of short term, biologic variation studies (7 to 10 weekly blood draws). This approach has significant shortcomings including small number of nonrandomly selected subjects, short periods of repeated samplings, rigid exclusion criteria, and the issue of non-intervening seasonal variation. Not only is seasonal variation associated with significant changes of blood and plasma volumes, but also with altered activity levels and food intake. We used a numerical approach (PMID:35137000) to derive the seasonal biologic variation of selected outpatient chemistry analytes. We compare our estimates to those of the EFLM. Methods De-identified Siemens Vista sodium, chloride, bicarbonate (CO2), potassium, creatinine, urea, and phosphate results were obtained from Ottawa Hospital outpatients for November 2009 to January 2014. All measurements were identified with unique patient identifiers and date and time of testing. Results outside their reference interval were excluded from analysis. For each season and test, we tabulated consecutive presumably nonemergent intrapatient paired results that were analyzed between 6am and 6pm on weekdays and separated by up to 2190 hr (3 months). The separation time (hours) was converted into a modulus 24 time yielding hourly intervals of separation from 0 to 1 hr to 23 to 24 hours. For each interval, we determined the standard deviation of duplicates (SDD) between the paired intrapatient results. SDD was graphed against the midpoints of the hourly separation and linear regression was used to determine the y-intercept which constitutes the total of analytical, intra-patient biological and preanalytical variation for each season. The y-intercept was normalized with the grand mean to provide the total seasonal intrapatient CVanalytical+biological+preanalytical. We compared these total patient seasonal variations to the magnitude of the sum of the EFLM intrapatient CV and their usual analytical variation. Results For electrolytes, 95,000 outpatients provided 288,000 electrolyte panels; mean age was 58.5(SD=18.5) years. Between 1000 and 2000 paired observations were used to determine each electrolyte intrapatient total seasonal CVi. The Figure compares the seasonal variation to the EFLM CVi with added analytical variation, based on that of the Roche Cobas. The average standard errors follow: potassium (5.9%), CO2 (8.8%), chloride (4.8%), sodium (1.4%), creatinine (3.1%), urea (8.6%) and phosphate (9.3%). All the outpatient biological variations demonstrate seasonality. The EFLM sodium, chloride and urea variations are close to, but less than the total seasonal CV. The CO2 graph demonstrates higher variation in the winter and spring, coincident with increased respiratory infections and respiratory distress. Conclusion Originally, the EFLM normal subject variation database was used appropriately to determine optimal analytical performance. Despite the bountiful literature on seasonal variation, the database’s purpose has morphed to an all-season tool for determining reference change values of (normal) subjects and recently, to monitoring (normal) subject variation. With these newer applications, the EFLM variation estimates have become less fit for purpose. We must embrace the transformation of real patient data into useful information that will improve patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207