B-343 Validation of the Diagnostics Biochem Canada Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) ELISA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a neuropeptide involved in numerous physiological processes, including vasodilation and immune modulation. Accurate measurement of VIP concentrations is commonly used to diagnose and monitor VIPomas, rare neuroendocrine tumors that secrete VIP. This study aimed to validate the VIP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit from Diagnostics Biochem Canada Inc. (DBC) for clinical testing. Methods Accuracy, linearity, precision, plate drift, analytical sensitivity, reference interval verification, analyte stability, collection tube stability, and dilution verification studies were conducted. Experiments used endogenous patient specimens when available and plasma pools spiked with VIP, as needed (AnaSpec; AS-22873; Fremont, CA). Accuracy was assessed by comparing VIP concentrations in de-identified patient specimens (n=33) using the DBC ELISA method against an existing radioimmunoassay (RIA; DiaSource; Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Linearity was evaluated using percent split dilutions between spiked and blank plasma pools (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%). Precision was evaluated by testing 4 replicates of each kit-provided control across 5 runs. Plate drift analysis was conducted due to variations noted between controls during validation experiments (average -15.8% change between plate beginning and end). Various pipetting methods were compared (single-channel, 8-channel, 96-channel) to determine if observed plate drift was influenced by differences in incubation times. Analytical sensitivity was verified by running 10 replicates of calibrator A and 3 replicates of calibrator B and analyzing optical density (OD) values using EP Evaluator. The manufacturer-provided reference interval was verified using plasma specimens from healthy donors (n=26; 12 males, 14 females) collected in pre-cooled EDTA tubes following manufacturer-recommended collection protocols. Additional stability conditions (ambient, refrigerated, and freeze/thaw) were evaluated using spiked plasma pools. The effect of temperature on collection was analyzed by aliquoting spiked plasma into EDTA tubes that were pre-cooled for 10 minutes or kept at room temperature and comparing results after 30 minutes. Dilution verification was performed using spiked specimens tested neat and using 1:2 and 1:5 dilutions. Results Accuracy studies showed positive, negative, and overall qualitative agreement of 90.9%, 95.5%, and 93.9%, respectively between the two methods. Quantitative bias of -33.34% was observed compared to the DiaSource RIA method, with larger bias as VIP concentrations increased. Linearity studies demonstrated percent recoveries ranging 82.0-111.8%. Precision studies revealed within-run and total %CVs less than or equal to 16.4%. Plate drift analysis indicated acceptable precision across each plate using different pipetting methods, with results ranging 3.3-6.4%CV. The manufacturer sensitivity claim of 20.0 pg/mL was verified. All healthy donor specimens were within the manufacturer-provided reference interval of 0-89.1 pg/mL. VIP stability was confirmed up to 4 hours ambient temperature, 24 hours refrigerated, and up to 2 freeze/thaw cycles after initial testing. Percent recovery of spiked plasma aliquoted into room temperature EDTA tubes compared to pre-cooled EDTA tubes ranged 82.2-106.1%. Dilution verification studies showed percent recoveries ranged 93.4-115.2% using 1:2 and 1:5 dilutions. Conclusions The DBC VIP ELISA kit demonstrated acceptable performance across all validation parameters. The kit provided reliable and accurate measurement of VIP concentrations, supporting its application for diagnosing and monitoring conditions associated with VIP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".