MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414743235 · doi:10.1002/jmri.70137

Editorial for “Reliability of <scp>4D</scp> Flow <scp>MRI</scp> ‐Derived Pulmonary Regurgitant Fraction in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: Impact of Measurement Location and Pulmonary Artery Geometry”

2025· editorial· en· W4414743235 on OpenAlexaff
Zezhong Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetralogy of FallotRegurgitant fractionPulmonary arteryFlow (mathematics)Pulmonary regurgitationMain Pulmonary Artery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The views expressed in this editorial are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Iterative Health. Chenxi Shi is an employee of Iterative Health. This work received no funding and is unrelated to the company's products or services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0130.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207