A stochastic approach to integerize floating-point estimates in gridded population mapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gridded population datasets are increasingly relied upon for spatial planning, resource allocation, and disaster response due to their flexible integration with other spatial data layers. These datasets are typically produced by disaggregating population counts from administrative units into grid cells, yielding non-integer values that preserve overall counts. However, floating-point cell values are often difficult for users to interpret, and standard rounding approaches may introduce aggregation errors at administrative levels that affect planning decisions. Here, we present a stochastic integerisation method that preserves total population and demographic proportions, and compare it with existing approaches. The method separates the value of each cell into integer and decimal parts, and probabilistically allocates the residual based on decimal magnitudes. Applying the method to gridded population data shows that it effectively reduces unrealistic population predictions in uninhabited areas. The results also demonstrate that the new integerisation method can effectively convert floating-point population estimates into integers while preserving both spatial distribution and demographic proportions, such as age-sex structures. These findings highlight the performance of the proposed integerisation method to generate reliable gridded population distribution datasets across diverse contexts that are easier to interpret, particularly for areas with sparse populations or complex geometries of underlying administrative units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".