MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414748487 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17349-8

Exploring soil microbial and plant parasitic nematode communities involved in the apple replant disease complex in Nova Scotia

2025· article· en· W4414748487 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shawkat Ali, Keith Fuller, Svetlana N. Yurgel, Vicky Lévesque, Mark Mazzola

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsOrchardPopulationFusariumPathosystemPythiumNematodePratylenchus penetransDisease managementMicrobiome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Apple replant disease (ARD) is incited by a complex of causal agents including various fungi, oomycetes, and plant parasitic nematodes. These causal agents can differ significantly in abundance between orchard sites within a geographic region. Knowledge of the specific etiology of ARD is required in order to develop commercially viable soil management strategies to combat specific/individual components of the pathogen complex. In this study, we analyzed soil from six ARD affected orchard sites to assess the presence and composition of fungal, bacterial and oomycetes communities, as well as the prevalence of plant parasitic nematodes. Five fungal, and 17 bacterial classes were differentially represented in the soil microbiomes across the different locations. Mortierellomycetes was the most abundant fungal taxa represented followed by Sordariomycetes. Mortierella exigua , a fungal endophyte, was the most abundant fungal amplicon sequence variant (ASV) in the core microbiome. Among bacteria, Proteobacteria was the most prevalent phylum identified in these orchard soils. Several potential phytopathogenic fungi associated with ARD, as well as endophytes including Fusarium oxysporum , F. solani , Nectria ramulariae , Ilyonectria robusta and Nectriaceae , were identified in ARD soils. Among oomycetes, Pythium attrantheridium ( Globisporangium attrantheridium ), and P. irregulare ( Globisporangium irregulare ) were the most abundant taxa. Additionally, six different groups of plant-parasitic nematodes were found across the ARD orchard soils. Root-lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp., which are commonly associated with ARD, were identified in all orchard soils at population densities range from 12 to 33/100 cm 3 soil. This research enhances our understanding of the ARD pathogen complex and provide important insights for developing alternative disease management strategies in the apple industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→