MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414751358 · doi:10.2196/80569

Serial 12-Lead Electrocardiogram–Based Deep-Learning Model for Hospital Admission Prediction in Emergency Department Cardiac Presentations: Retrospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4414751358 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arda Altintepe, Kutsev Bengisu Ozyoruk

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Cardio · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyEmergency departmentHospital admissionCohort studyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) crowding is often attributed to a slow hospitalization process, leading to reduced quality of care. Predicting early disposition with cardiac-presenting patients is challenging: most are ultimately discharged, yet those with a cardiac etiology frequently require hospital admission. Existing scores rely on single-time-point data and often underperform when patient risk evolves during the visit. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a real-time deep-learning model that fuses serial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms with sequential vitals and routinely available clinical data to predict hospital admission early in ED encounters. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV, MIMIC-IV-ED, and MIMIC-IV-ECG databases. Adults presenting with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or presyncope and at least one ECG within their ED stay were included. Two evaluation cohorts were defined: all stays with ≥1 ECG (N=30,421) and a subset with ≥2 ECGs during the encounter (N=11,273). To predict hospital admission, we first established two baseline models: a tabular model (random forest) trained on structured clinical variables including demographics, triage acuity, past medical history, medications, and laboratory results, and an ECG-only model that learned directly from raw 12-lead waveforms. We then developed a multimodal deep-learning model that combined ECGs with sequential vital signs as well as the same static tabular features. All models were restricted to data available during the stay up to the time of the last ECG. Performance was assessed with stratified 5-fold cross-validation using identical splits across models. RESULTS: The multimodal model achieved an Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) of 0.911 when trained on all eligible stays. The model predicted disposition after the final ECG was taken, which was a median of 0.3 hours after triage and 4.6 hours before ED departure. Baseline models performed worse: the ECG-only model had an AUROC of 0.852, and the tabular random forest had an AUROC of 0.886. In the subset requiring at least two ECGs within the stay, ECG-only reached an AUROC of 0.859, and random forest, with the longer interval to chart tabular data, reached a higher AUROC of 0.911. The multimodal model had AUROC 0.924, and outperformed baselines in each cohort (paired DeLong P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serial ECGs, when integrated with evolving vitals and routine clinical features, enable accurate, early prediction of ED disposition in cardiac-presenting patients. This open-source, reproducible framework highlights the potential of multimodal deep learning to streamline ED flow, prioritize higher-risk cases, and detect evolving, time-critical pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR CardioSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207