MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414751464 · doi:10.1177/20543581251378016

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and Idiopathic Arginine Vasopressin Deficiency: A Peculiar Case Report of Accelerated Kidney Function Decline

2025· article· en· W4414751464 on OpenAlexaff
Farah Wehbe, Mark Elliott, Myriam Farah

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseaseVasopressinPolyuriaRenal functionKidneyCystKidney diseasePolycystic kidney disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a common genetic kidney disorder characterized by progressive cyst growth and kidney impairment. Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) is a rare disorder resulting from reduced arginine vasopressin production, causing polyuria and thirst. The coexistence of ADPKD and AVP-D is rarely documented in the literature. We report what may be the first documented case of a patient diagnosed with ADPKD and idiopathic AVP-D. Initially managed with intranasal desmopressin, the patient's kidney function declined earlier than expected based on her ADPKD, progressing to kidney failure at a low total kidney volume (836 mL). This paradoxical outcome suggests that while AVP-D may have initially slowed cyst growth, her uncontrolled AVP-D likely contributed to kidney function decline, presumably due to recurrent volume depletion and acute kidney injuries. This case highlights the need for individualized AVP-D management in ADPKD patients and reiterates AVP's role in the complex pathophysiology of ADPKD progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207