MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414751501 · doi:10.14423/smj.0000000000001871

Utilizing Learning Communities to Implement a Wellness-in-Action Session in Undergraduate Medical Education

2025· article· en· W4414751501 on OpenAlexaff
J. Jaber, Milena Gould-Suarez, Connie Tran, Eric Lee, D'Juanna White-Satcher, Jennifer Okoh, Achilia Morrow, E. Lee Poythress, Nital Appelbaum, Doris Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthern Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsCentre for Family Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)SocializationCurriculumPromotion (chess)Learning community

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Learning communities (LCs) are on the rise in medical education. Key features of LCs include fostering student learning, wellness, and engagement. The ways in which different programs are currently using LCs are still relatively new, however, and literature on this topic is scarce. We developed and incorporated a wellness-in-action session, coined Brian's Field Day, into our LC curriculum with the aim to improve self-care, camaraderie, and socialization. METHODS: More than 180 first-year medical students and 20 LC faculty advisors participated in Brian's Field Day, a large-scale 1-hour wellness-in-action session, in academic years (AYs) 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. The session was divided into different activities, including yoga, meditation, dodgeball, kickball, coloring, pet therapy, board games, walking, improvisation, and Zumba. All students received an electronic survey assessing their perceptions of the activity. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 47% (86/183 students) in AY 2021-2022 and 49% (90/182 students) in AY 2022-2023. Overall, postactivity perceptions were positive with mean scores ranging from 4.00 to 4.61 (standard deviation [SD] range ± 0.69-1.30) for "enjoyment," "improved camaraderie," "should continue as part of the curriculum," and "would like more events like this." The mean was 3.96 (SD ±1.15) and 3.83 (SD ±1.38) for "improving self-care" in AY 2021-2022 and AY 2022-2023, respectively. Themed qualitative comments also indicated improved student-student and faculty-student bonding and the desire for more similar activities. CONCLUSIONS: Academic stress among medical students is high and many schools have incorporated LCs into their curricula to help with socialization and promotion of wellness and community. As more schools adopt LCs, they should consider integrating a wellness-in-action session as a fun way to augment both peer-to-peer and student-faculty relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouthern Medical JournalSame topicInnovative Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207