Utilizing Learning Communities to Implement a Wellness-in-Action Session in Undergraduate Medical Education
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Learning communities (LCs) are on the rise in medical education. Key features of LCs include fostering student learning, wellness, and engagement. The ways in which different programs are currently using LCs are still relatively new, however, and literature on this topic is scarce. We developed and incorporated a wellness-in-action session, coined Brian's Field Day, into our LC curriculum with the aim to improve self-care, camaraderie, and socialization. METHODS: More than 180 first-year medical students and 20 LC faculty advisors participated in Brian's Field Day, a large-scale 1-hour wellness-in-action session, in academic years (AYs) 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. The session was divided into different activities, including yoga, meditation, dodgeball, kickball, coloring, pet therapy, board games, walking, improvisation, and Zumba. All students received an electronic survey assessing their perceptions of the activity. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 47% (86/183 students) in AY 2021-2022 and 49% (90/182 students) in AY 2022-2023. Overall, postactivity perceptions were positive with mean scores ranging from 4.00 to 4.61 (standard deviation [SD] range ± 0.69-1.30) for "enjoyment," "improved camaraderie," "should continue as part of the curriculum," and "would like more events like this." The mean was 3.96 (SD ±1.15) and 3.83 (SD ±1.38) for "improving self-care" in AY 2021-2022 and AY 2022-2023, respectively. Themed qualitative comments also indicated improved student-student and faculty-student bonding and the desire for more similar activities. CONCLUSIONS: Academic stress among medical students is high and many schools have incorporated LCs into their curricula to help with socialization and promotion of wellness and community. As more schools adopt LCs, they should consider integrating a wellness-in-action session as a fun way to augment both peer-to-peer and student-faculty relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it