MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414755521 · doi:10.1039/d5an00839e

Detection of carbapenemase-mediated antimicrobial resistance using surface-enhanced Raman scattering

2025· article· en· W4414755521 on OpenAlexafffund
Ziying Wang, Hridaynath Bhattacharjee, Mitchell A Jeffs, Rachel A. V. Gray, Yazan Bdour, Aristides Docoslis, Christopher T. Lohans, Carlos Escobedo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsAntibioticsAntimicrobialRaman scatteringAntibiotic resistanceBacteriaDrug resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant global health threat, necessitating rapid and precise detection methods. One widespread mechanism of AMR involves bacterial production of β-lactamase enzymes which render β-lactam antibiotics ineffective. The ability of β-lactamases with carbapenemase activity to degrade carbapenems, β-lactams used as antibiotics of last resort, is of particular concern. Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) cause infections with high mortality rates, hence, their timely detection is of utmost importance. Here, we applied surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) to the detection of carbapenemase activity, where our data reveal that enzyme-catalyzed carbapenem hydrolysis results in distinct spectral fingerprint changes. We capitalize on this finding by illustrating an experimental methodology implementing SERS that permits the detection of CPOs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207