Convergent evolution of aerobic fermentation through divergent mechanisms acting on key shared glycolytic genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the tree of life becomes increasingly accessible to molecular investigations, describing mechanisms underlying evolutionary convergence and constraint will be crucial to understanding diversification. The lineage including the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae evolved aerobic fermentation in part through an ancient whole genome duplication and retention of glycolytic genes. To evaluate glycolytic rates across diverse yeasts, we developed and deployed an extracellular acidification rates (ECAR) assay on 299 species that span more than 400 million years of evolution and identified a clade in the genus Saturnispora that convergently evolved aerobic fermentation. Through comparative genomics and transcriptomics, we found that several glycolytic genes had higher expression and novel cis-regulatory elements in aerobically fermenting Saturnispora species. When the transcription factor required for their activation was deleted in Saturnispora dispora, the mutants had reduced glycolytic rates and increased respiration. Intriguingly, many of the upregulated genes are orthologous to duplicated glycolytic genes in S. cerevisiae. These divergent genetic mechanisms affecting the same set of genes suggest that there are strong evolutionary constraints on how aerobic fermentation can arise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".