MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414757801 · doi:10.1159/000548713

Sex Differences in Phenomenology of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia

2025· article· en· W4414757801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurodegenerative Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of CalgaryPublic Health OntarioCARE CanadaWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health SciencesQueen's UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of TorontoNational Institutes of HealthFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMitacsEisaiOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWeston Brain InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental Health FoundationFondation Brain CanadaJohns Hopkins UniversityBrightFocus FoundationOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationH. Lundbeck A/SPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoBiogenNational Institute on AgingConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
KeywordsPhenomenology (philosophy)DementiaRelevance (law)DiseaseInterpretative phenomenological analysisLived experience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) are highly prevalent in patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD). We examined sex differences in the frequency and severity of BPSD in patients with AD living in long-term care homes or admitted to inpatient psychiatric units. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Standardizing Care for Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Quality of Life in Dementia (StaN) study (ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03672201). BPSD were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician rating scale (NPI-C), and symptom clusters were clustered as follows: (1) psychosis (hallucinations and delusions), (2) emotional distress cluster A (depression and anxiety), (3) emotional distress cluster B (depression, anxiety, and apathy), and (4) agitation (agitation, aggression, irritability, aberrant motor behavior, and aberrant vocalizations). Sex differences in frequency and severity of individual BPSD and clusters were compared using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and generalized linear models while controlling for age and place of residence. RESULTS: Females had higher frequency (males = 21.7% vs. females = 42.9%, χ2 = 8.83, N = 174, p = 0.003) and greater severity of delusions (mean [SD] males = 51.87 [44.15], mean [SD] females = 67.93 [70.53], U = 2,924, N = 174, p = 0.002). Males had higher frequency (males = 51.8% vs. females = 27.5%, χ2 = 10.80, N = 174, p = 0.001) and greater severity of sleep disorders (mean [SD] males = 2.94 [4.21], mean [SD] females = 1.76 [3.92], U = 2,885.50, N = 174, p = 0.002). After controlling for age and residence, sex differences remained significant for delusions (Wald χ2 = 3.97, N = 176, p = 0.046), but not for sleep disorders. There were no sex differences in the frequency or severity of any BPSD clusters. CONCLUSIONS: We observed sex differences in the frequency and severity of specific BPSD. Future studies should aim to understand potential mechanisms underlying these differences and to study their relevance in screening, and for individualized sex-specific management of BPSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it