Treinamento em mindfulness e impactos na saúde mental em funcionários não docentes de uma universidade pública
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of a Mindfulness-based Intervention in relation to levels of mindfulness, perceived stress, depression, anxiety and burnout. Methods: quasi-experimental study with a sample of 60 workers from a public university. Participants were allocated to a group that received intervention (GE: 30) and another that did not receive intervention, considered a control group (CG: 30). They were assessed at the beginning and after the intervention. Results: The EG showed an increase in the total mean Mindfulness score and in two facets of the FFMQ scale (observing and non-reactivity to inner experience). When compared to the CG, there was a reduction in the average scores of perceived stress, depression and anxiety. The same effect after intervention was not observed for burnout. Conclusion: Mindfulness training showed the sample's perceived levels of stress, depression and anxiety. The data highlight the potential of this intervention to contribute as a prevention and promotion strategy for workers' mental health. Keywords: Mindfulness; Stress, Mental health; Workplace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".