MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414759437 · doi:10.60059/spl.2023.2.3-17

Предизвикателства пред общообразователните училища в работата в приобщаваща среда

2025· article· bg· W4414759437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Милен Замфиров, Маргарита Бакрачева

Bibliographic record

VenueСпециална педагогика и логопедия · 2025
Typearticle
Languagebg
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology of Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Product (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Статията описва резултатите от проведени интервюта и отговорите на 123 общообразователни учители за оценката им относно получаването на подкрепа, разпознаването и възможностите за улесняване на работата им с четирите категории ученици, обхванати от Наредбата за приобщаващото образование – със специални образователни потребности, в риск, надарени и с хронични заболявания. Целта на изследването е очертаване на насоки от гледна точка на общообразователните учители за основните затруднения и възможности за подобряване на ефективността във всекидневната им работа. Отчетени са и факторите, свързани с възприемания стрес, и предложенията на учителите за подобряване на условията на работа. Резултатите показват диференцирани потребности и подкрепа на учителите за повишаване на постиганите резултати. Основни очертани предизвикателства са работата с ученици със СОП и екипността. Изведени са категоризирани като „външни“ и „вътрешни“ фактори, които оказват влияние на педагогическата практика. Резултатите ще бъдат използвани като входна информация за изготвянето на кратки ръководства и скринингови инструменти за улесняване на управлението на класната стая с хетерогенен състав ученици. Библиография: Бакрачева, М., Тоцева, Я. (2022). Аспекти на педагогическата комуникация в условия на криза. В: Педагогическата комуникация в условия на криза. Сборник доклади от научно-практическа конференция, 11–55. С.: Фабер. Бакрачева, М., Тоцева, Я. (2023). Преживяван бърнаут, бораут и мобинг от учители в детски градини и училища в условията на COVID-19 кризата. Педагогика, 95(2), 190–204. doi: 10.53656/ped2023-2.05 Замфиров, М., Евгениева, Е., Бакрачева, М. (2023а). Оценка на общообразователните и ресурсните учители за работа в парадигмата на приобщаващо образование. Педагогика, 95(5), 589–608. Замфиров, М., Евгениева, Е., Бакрачева, М. (2023б). Самооценка на общообразователните и ресурсните учители за работа в парадигмата на приобщаващо образование. Стратегии на образователната и научната политика, 31(3), 239–255. Тоцева, Я., Бакрачева, М. (2022). Дигиталните компетентности на учителите в детски градини и училища в условията на кризата, предизвикана от COVID пандемията. В: Педагогическата комуникация в условия на криза, Сборник доклади от научно-практическа конференция, 56–75. С.: Фабер Calkins, H. M. (2019). Parent and Teacher Perceptions of the Importance of Social-Emotional Learning in the Schools, Theses and Dissertations, 1166. Retrieved from: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1166 Čopková, R. (2021). The relationship between burnout syndrome and boreout syndrome of secondary school teachers during COVID-19. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 138–151. doi: 10.33902/JPR.2021269824. Guillén-Gámez, F. D. & Rodríguez-Fernández, R. (2022). Meta-Analysis on the Attitudes of Active Teachers About the Use of Educational Technology According to Gender. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep339. doi: 10.30935/cedtech/11408. Moon, B & McCluskey, J. (2021). A Longitudinal Study of Teacher Victimization at Schools: Prevalence, Predictors, and Negative Consequence. Retrieved from https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/306556.pdf Müller, L. & Goldenberg, G. (2020). Education in Times of Crisis: The Potential Implications of School Closures for Teachers and Students: A Review of Research Evidence on School Closures and International Approaches to Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. London: Chartered College of Teaching Retrieved from https://my.chartered.college/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/CCTReport070520_FINAL.pdf Prakapas, R., Merfeldaite, O., Railienė, A., Indrašienė, V., Jegelevičienė, V., Gusauskiene, M. & Dirzyte, A. (2024). Teacher Victimization by Students, Their Parents, and School Staff: Prevalence and Links with Teachers’ Life Satisfaction in a Lithuanian Sample. Education Sciences, 14. 10.3390/educsci14020163. Pressley, T. (2021). Factors Contributing to Teacher Burnout During COVID-19, Educational Researcher, 50(5), 325–327. doi: 10.3102/0013189X211004138. Saha, S. & Dutta, T. (2020). A Study on the Psychological Crisis during the Lockdown Caused Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Afr. J. Biol. Med. Res, 3(2), 41–49. Sarikaya, M. (2021). An investigation of the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and burnout among music teachers”. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 3(4), 789-806, doi: 10.46328/ijonses.274. Sokal, L. J., Trudel, L. E. & Babb, J. (2020a). Canadian Teachers’ Attitudes toward Change, Efficacy, and Burnout during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, 1, 100016, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100016. Sokal, L. J., Trudel, L. E. & Babb, J. (2020b). Supporting Teachers in Times of Change: The Job Demands-Resources Model and Teacher Burnout during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 3(2), 67–74. doi: 10.11114/ijce.v3i2.4931. Uzeyir, O. (2021). A meta-analytic review of emotional intelligence in gifted individuals: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110503, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110503 Weißenfels, M., Klopp, E. & Perels, F. (2022). Changes in Teacher Burnout and Self-Efficacy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Interrelations and e-Learning Variables Related to Change, Frontiers in Education, 6, 736992. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.736992 Weißenfels, M., Klopp, E. & Perels, F. (2022). Changes in Teacher Burnout and Self-Efficacy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Interrelations and e-Learning Variables Related to Change, Frontiers in Education, 6, 736992. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.736992

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСпециална педагогика и логопедияSame topicPsychology of Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207