From Commuting to Connectivity? Cross-Border Telework and the Evolution of Cross-Border Labour Markets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of digital communication technologies and the COVID-19 pandemic have changed the nature of work, giving rise to cross-border teleworking as an important dimension of labour mobility. This study explores the interplay between cross-border telework and traditional cross-border labour mobility, focusing on two case studies: Cascadia (US/Canada) and the Greater Region (EU). Through the analysis of desk research, legislative documents, and in-depth interviews, the study examines how national borders and telework shape the development of digital cross-border labour markets. The findings show that while cross-border telework uses digital tools to foster economic integration and reduce geographical constraints, its growth is hampered by inadequate regulatory frameworks. The article concludes that cross-border telework complements and reshapes traditional cross-border labour markets, presenting both opportunities and challenges for regional economic integration in a digitally connected world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it