MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414766435 · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2025.1614744

From fossil fuels to green growth: rethinking new models through digital innovation, labor force and sustainable investment

2025· article· en· W4414766435 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xinyu Hu, Lisa M. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Environmental Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental degradationFossil fuelRobustness (evolution)Resource depletionSustainable developmentIndustrial ecologySustainabilityNatural capitalCapital (architecture)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past three decades, accelerating environmental degradation driven largely by rising carbon emissions has posed serious challenges to global ecological stability. In response, this study investigates the asymmetric and nonlinear effects of key macroeconomic and structural factors on environmentally sustainable growth within the G-7 economies (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) from 1990 to 2023. Specifically, it examines the differentiated impacts of fossil fuel consumption, digital economy expansion, labor force participation, gross fixed capital formation, trade openness, and natural resource utilization on green growth. To address slope heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence across countries, the analysis employs the Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCEMG) estimators. Results reveal clear evidence of asymmetric dynamics: positive shocks in digital development, trade openness, capital investment, and labor force participation significantly enhance green growth, whereas increases in fossil fuel consumption and unregulated resource extraction hinder environmental performance. Negative shocks in digital and trade activity, by contrast, exhibit muted or statistically insignificant effects highlighting path dependency and structural inertia in green development processes. To reinforce the reliability of the results, robustness checks were conducted using Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Dynamic OLS (DOLS) estimators. These alternative approaches confirmed the direction, magnitude, and statistical significance of key relationships, underscoring the validity of the asymmetric modeling approach. The findings carry substantial policy implications: G-7 economies must reduce fossil fuel dependency, foster inclusive digital infrastructure, and align capital and trade policies with long-term environmental goals. The study contributes novel insights into the shock-sensitive nature of green growth transitions, offering a methodological and policy framework relevant to both advanced and emerging economies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Environmental ScienceSame topicEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207