MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414767468 · doi:10.1103/18sn-hxtb

NuSTAR as an Axion Helioscope

2025· article· gv· W4414767468 on OpenAlexaff
J. Ruz, Elisa Todarello, Julia K. Vogel, Francisco R. Candón, Maurizio Giannotti, Brian W. Grefenstette, H. S. Hudson, I. G. Hannah, I.G. Irastorza, Crystal S. Kim, Marco Regis, David M. Smith, Marco Taoso, J. Trujillo Bueno

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languagegv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareUniversità degli Studi di TorinoMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsAxionDark matterParameter spaceCoupling (piping)Limit (mathematics)Magnetic fieldSpace (punctuation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel approach to investigating axions and axionlike particles by studying their potential conversion into x-rays within the Sun's atmospheric magnetic field. Utilizing high-sensitivity data from the nuclear spectroscopic telescope array (NuSTAR) collected during the 2020 solar minimum, along with advanced solar atmospheric magnetic field models, we establish a new limit on the axion-photon coupling strength g_{aγ}≲7.3×10^{-12} GeV^{-1} at 95% CL for axion masses m_{a}≲4×10^{-7} eV. This constraint surpasses current ground-based experimental limits, studying previously unexplored regions of the axion-photon coupling parameter space up to masses of m_{a}≲3.4×10^{-4} eV. These findings mark a significant advancement in our ability to probe axion properties and strengthen indirect searches for dark matter candidates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207