MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414768686 · doi:10.2196/75234

Interpretation of Health-Smart Home Data and Implications for Clinical Decision-Making: Inductive Content Analysis

2025· article· en· W4414768686 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gordana Dermody, Diane J. Cook, Roschelle Fritz

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Nursing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Nursing Research
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)Representation (politics)VisualizationData visualizationContent analysisHealth data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Health-smart home technologies offer real-time sensor-based monitoring of older adult activities of daily living, allowing for early detection of changes in health. The way clinicians interpret and use this data, particularly in visualized formats, such as bar, line, and pie graphs, remains underexplored. Objective: A qualitative descriptive study design with a quantitative component was used to explore how nurses interpret sensor-derived health data from health-smart homes in 3 cases. Methods: Using an inductive content analysis approach, we analyzed nurses' qualitative interpretations of existing sensor-derived health data from health-smart homes from 3 older adults living with ambient whole-home sensing. Nurses provided structured written feedback on visualized trends in sensor-derived health data, including activity, sleep, and mobility patterns. Results: The findings highlight both opportunities and challenges of using sensor-derived health data in older adults' care. Nurses identified key patterns in sleep, mobility, and home engagement, but interpretation difficulties, such as unclear sleep metrics and lack of clinical context, hindered decision-making. Nurses preferred bar and line graphs over pie charts for interpreting these data. Survey results show a statistically significant difference in how nurses rated different graph types (χ²2=17.1, P<.001), with pie charts rated significantly lower than both bar and line graphs (P<.001 and P=.008, respectively). These findings underscore the need for improved data visualization and integration to enhance the clinical utility of sensor-derived health data from health-smart homes. Conclusions: Findings indicate that nurses were able to provide accurate interpretations of the sensor-derived health data from health-smart homes. However, there is a need for improved visualization techniques and clinician training to optimize health-smart home data for early intervention. Standardized approaches to data representation could enhance nurses' ability to detect and act on subtle yet important information about older adults' health changes occurring in home settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR NursingSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207