Neuroanatomical features reveal accelerated brain age in alcohol use disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Brain age is a novel measure to characterize the integrity of neurocognitive functioning and brain health in various psychiatric and neurological disorders. Although there is a literature suggesting premature aging of the brain in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), studies directly examining brain age are rare. Therefore, the current study was designed to estimate brain age in AUD individuals using brain morphological features, such as cortical thickness and brain volume. Methods: The sample included a group of 30 adult males with a history of AUD but maintaining abstinence and a group of 30 male controls without any history of AUD. Brain age was computed using an XGBoost regression model with 187 brain morphological features of cortical thickness and brain volume as predictors. An exploratory correlational analysis between brain age measures and features of neuropsychological performance, impulsivity, and alcohol consumption was also performed. Results: Findings revealed that AUD individuals showed an increase of 1.70 years in their brain age relative to their chronological age. Further, in the AUD group, higher brain age was significantly associated with poor executive functioning, while a larger gap between brain age and actual age was associated with lower non-planning impulsivity and later age of onset for regular drinking in those with AUD. Conclusions: AUD individuals manifested accelerated brain aging, possibly representing compromised brain health. Brain age measures were found to be associated with some of the measures of neurocognition, impulsivity, and alcohol consumption. These findings may have important implications for the early identification, prevention, and treatment of AUD. However, future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".