MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414773129 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djaf257

In Memoriam: Pierre Hainaut (1958-2025)

2025· article· en· W4414773129 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Isabel Achatz, Emilie Montellier, Christian Kratz, David Malkin

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)GlobePopulationAgency (philosophy)Interpretation (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On behalf of the Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Consortium, it is with immense sorrow that we announce the passing of Professor Pierre Hainaut, an internationally respected scientist, who died while hiking in the Italian Alps on July 31, 2025, at the age of 67 years. His sudden departure has left a profound void in the scientific community and in the hearts of those who knew him—as a brilliant scientist, a generous mentor, and a deeply compassionate human being. Born in Liège, Belgium, Pierre Hainaut was a pioneer in cancer biology, whose career was defined by groundbreaking work on the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. His research transformed our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor development, particularly through his landmark contributions to the classification and interpretation of TP53 mutations. In this regard, he played a central role in developing the TP53 mutation database, initially housed at the International Agency for Research on Cancer and now at the National Cancer Institute, which has become an essential resource for researchers worldwide. His keen interest and expertise in the field of genetic epidemiology enabled him to explore patterns of tumor presentation in the context of genetic predisposition across different population demographics. This work underpinned and highlighted the vast inequities around the globe in access to genetic testing and care for individuals with cancer predisposition. Pierre dedicated his time and efforts to help colleagues address and identify solutions to these challenges. In recent years, he was immersed in efforts to unravel ways to use functional assays to stratify the cancer risks associated with TP53 variants and the complex relationship between TP53 genotype and immune profiling. It will be incumbent on his colleagues to continue this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207