Non-uniqueness phase in hyperbolic marked random connection models using the spherical transform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A non-uniqueness phase for infinite clusters is proven for a class of marked random connection models (RCMs) on the d -dimensional hyperbolic space, double struck upper H Superscript d H d ${\mathbb{H}^d}$ , in a high volume-scaling regime. The approach taken in this paper utilizes the spherical transform on double struck upper H Superscript d H d ${\mathbb{H}^d}$ to diagonalize convolution by the adjacency function and the two-point function and bound their upper L squared right arrow upper L squared L 2 → L 2 $L^2\to L^2$ operator norms. Under some circumstances, this spherical transform approach also provides bounds on the triangle diagram that allows for a derivation of certain mean-field critical exponents. In particular, the results are applied to some Boolean and weight-dependent hyperbolic RCMs. While most of the paper is concerned with the high volume-scaling regime, the existence of the non-uniqueness phase is also proven without this scaling for some RCMs whose resulting graphs are almost surely not locally finite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".