MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414777537 · doi:10.24912/jmts.v8i2.31756

EVALUASI KINERJA SIMPANG BERSINYAL JALAN GALUNGGUNG-JALAN BONDOWOSO-JALAN RAYA TIDAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PROGRAM PTV VISSIM 9.0

2025· article· en· W4414777537 on OpenAlexaff
Bambang Supriyanto, Pranoto Pranoto, Cyntia Prabandari

Bibliographic record

VenueJMTS Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Transport Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisSimTraffic volumeIntersection (aeronautics)Road trafficTravel time

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The signalized intersection at the Jalan Galunggung, Jalan Bondowoso and Jalan Raya Tidar in Malang City often experiences traffic congestion due to the high volume of vehicles heading to activity centers such as shopping malls, universities, schools, and densely populated residential areas. Simpang Galunggung frequently encounters traffic conflicts caused by the high level of traffic activity. This study aims to analyze and evaluate the performance of this signalized intersection using the Indonesian PKJI 2023 and the PTV Vissim 9.0 software. Additionally, the study aims to select alternative solutions and predict the performance of the signalized intersection in the next five years. From the results of the analysis of intersection performance using PKJI 2023 shows a degree of saturation of 0.91258 on holidays and 0.97065 on weekdays. The average delay value at the intersection was 66.3237 seconds/vehicle during holidays and 167.311 seconds/vehicle during weekdays, both categorized into the level of service F. Meanwhile, the modeling analysis with PTV Vissim 9.0 yielded an average intersection delay of 67.67 seconds/vehicle for holidays and 71.37 seconds/vehicle for weekdays, categorized into the level of service E. Some alternative solutions that can be done include changes in the number of phases, traffic engineering or road widening. Abstrak Simpang empat bersinyal Jalan Galunggung, Jalan Bondowoso dan Jalan Raya Tidar di Kota Malang sering mengalami kemacetan lalu lintas karena banyaknya kendaraan yang menuju pusat kegiatan seperti pusat perbelanjaan, kampus, sekolah dan pemukiman padat penduduk. Simpang Galunggung sering mengalami konflik lalu lintas yang disebabkan banyaknya aktifitas pergerakan lalu lintas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengevaluasi kinerja simpang bersinyal tersebut menggunakan PKJI 2023 dan perangkat lunak PTV Vissim 9.0. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk memilih solusi alternatif dan memprediksi kinerja simpang bersinyal pada lima tahun mendatang. Dari hasil analisa kinerja simpang menggunakan PKJI 2023 menunjukkan nilai derajat kejenuhan pada simpang sebesar 0,91258 pada hari libur dan 0,97065 pada hari kerja. Nilai tundaan simpang rata-rata yang dihasilkan sebesar 66,3237 det/smp pada hari libur dan 167,311 det/ smp pada hari kerja, keduanya dikategorikan dalam tingkat pelayanan F. Sedangkan dari analisa pemodelan pada PTV Vissim 9.0 diperoleh nilai tundaan simpang rata-rata sebesar 67,67 det/kend untuk hari libur dan 71,37 det/kend untuk hari kerja, dikategorikan ke dalam tingkat pelayanan simpang E. Solusi alternatif yang dapat diterapkan meliputi perubahan jumlah fase, rekayasa lalu lintas atau pelebaran ruas jalan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMTS Jurnal Mitra Teknik SipilSame topicUrban Transport Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207