Searching for a room of one’s own: The precarious subjectivities of Agatha Christie and Dorothy L. Sayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consistent with the call for papers, this study adds to the body of work on processes of precaritization using a micro-historical/biographical approach to examine the subjective, embodied experiences of two female authors who lived through a dramatic transformation in institutionalized conditions, i.e., the partial dismantling of institutionalized patriarchy in the UK in the early 20th century precipitated by first wave feminists. By moving beyond the focus on the “standard employment model” to include institutional structures that affect marriage, women’s control over their bodies and care and guardianship of children, this study examines how this transformation of the male breadwinner model precaritized middle class women who had previously been actively discouraged, both legally and culturally, from working. While Agatha Christie and Dorothy L. Sayers were two women born into the same conditions of legal patriarchy in Britain in the 1890s, differences in their embodied correspondence with patriarchal notions of female attractiveness produced very different expectations and life experiences. The availability of letters and autobiography offers a rare window into the subjective, embodied experiences of these two women as they struggled to navigate this sudden “emancipation” and the new expectation that they should be economically independent as it unfolded over their lifetimes. Finally, the body of writing they left as authors of detective fiction offers some insight into how, even though they distanced themselves from the feminist movement of the time, they also subtly resisted by ventriloquizing alternatives to patriarchal gender regimes in their fiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.064 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".