Le Projet international Ice Memory : les carottes de glace sont-elles patrimoine commun de l'humanité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des carottes de glace sont prélevées sur des glaciers sélectionnés par des chercheurs de plusieurs pays dans le cadre du Projet international Ice Memory. L’objectif est de documenter l’évolution du climat pour le bénéfice de chercheurs des générations futures. La Chaire de recherche Ice Memory Droit et Gouvernance vise plus spécifiquement à aborder les questions juridiques soulevées par le projet, notamment le statut à conférer aux carottes de glace qui revêtent un intérêt scientifique de premier ordre. Différents concepts juridiques élaborés en droit international public sont susceptibles de recevoir une application, au premier chef les concepts de patrimoine mondial et de patrimoine commun de l’humanité, mais aussi ceux d’apanage de l’humanité, de préoccupation commune de l’humanité et d’intérêt de l’humanité. Une revue de ces concepts amène à considérer avec une attention toute particulière celui de patrimoine commun de l’humanité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".