Quand les Autochtones réécrivent l’histoire ou comment se porte la réconciliation à Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les résultats de groupes de discussion menés à Montréal auprès de la population non autochtone, dans le cadre d’une recherche concernant les relations entre Autochtones et non-Autochtones dans les espaces publics urbains au Québec. Il discute des principales représentations sociospatiales véhiculées et de leurs impacts sur la renégociation de ces relations. Il soutient que l’impact des discours nationaux et municipaux actuels concernant la réconciliation est en partie visible dans la population, mais que la majorité des Montréalais et Montréalaises tend à participer, même involontairement, aux processus d’exclusion. Les processus d’altérisation liés au racisme ordinaire continuent à être bien actifs dans les espaces du quotidien, ce qui limite les possibilités de rééquilibrer la relation inégalitaire comme devrait le faire la réconciliation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".