MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Global Disparities in Premature Mortality

2025· article· en· W4414786708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Health Forum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute on AgingCarnegie Corporation of New YorkJapan International Cooperation AgencyTrond Mohn stiftelseBill and Melinda Gates FoundationEconomic and Social Research CouncilWorld Health Organization
KeywordsInequalityHealth equityLife expectancyMortality ratePopulationPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Persistent disparities in mortality across countries suggest uneven improvements in living standards and access to life-extending health technologies, as well as context-specific obstacles. Studies have analyzed cross-country inequality in mortality but have not widely contextualized those disparities in terms of developmental progress relative to a frontier representing a level of mortality achievable with broad access to the best health-enhancing technology and living standards available. Objective: To examine probability of premature death (PPD)-defined as probability of dying before 70 years of age-across countries and regions, benchmarking progress as years behind the lowest country-level PPD (the frontier). Design and Setting: This cross-sectional study used aggregate-level data from the 2024 United Nations World Population Prospects and Human Mortality Database to calculate PPD across 7 global regions and the 30 most populous countries. Data were analyzed from May to September 2025. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcomes were PPD and the number of years behind the lowest country-level PPD. Results: The frontier PPD fell from 57% to 12% from 1900 to 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa's PPD in 2019 was 52%, corresponding to the 1916 frontier PPD. However, sub-Saharan Africa had converged toward the frontier by over 40 years since 2000, when it had a 65% PPD. China has been converging toward the frontier since 1970, having been 93 years behind the frontier PPD in 1970 (with a 60% PPD) and 35 years behind in 2019 (21% PPD). The US has diverged away from the frontier, having been 29 years behind in 1970 (38% PPD) and 38 years in 2019 (22% PPD). Of the regions included, the North Atlantic (Western Europe and Canada) was the closest to the frontier, being 13 years behind in 2019 (15% PPD). The US, Central and Eastern Europe, and sub-Saharan Africa were the furthest above the 2019 PPD Preston curve (ie, they had a greater PPD than predicted by their per capita gross domestic product). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, disparities in PPD were likely to reflect major inequality in access to health-enhancing technologies and living standards, as well as context-specific obstacles. Technological and medical advancements leading to universal health benefits need to be rapidly and fairly disseminated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it