La resistencia comunitaria en los conflictos socioambientales en Las Pampas, Ecuador: implicaciones en derechos humanos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ecuador has facilitated the entry of extractive companies into local territories, where economic interests and permissive governments have led to violations of national and international regulations. This has caused socio-environmental conflicts with populations inhabiting the concessioned areas, leading to tensions and claims regarding their rights and the impacts on natural resources. This study examines the case of Las Pampas, where socio-environmental conflict dynamics have emerged due to the installation of the Canadian mining company Atico Mining, whose entry was facilitated by the omission and, in some cases, the active involvement of the State. Through a qualitative analysis that includes document reviews and testimonies from local actors, this work explores the psychosocial impacts of extractivism on the community and documents the non-violent resistance strategies implemented by its inhabitants. The results highlight the capacity for organization and the creation of support networks as community responses to the hostile installation of the mining industry, underscoring the power of local agency in facing the challenges posed by the extractive model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it