Indirect Electrochemical Regeneration of Manganese Oxide ( <scp> MnO <sub>x</sub> </scp> ) – Coated Media
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Manganese (Mn) in drinking water poses aesthetic, health, and operational concerns. One common removal method involves adsorbing soluble Mn(II) onto manganese (III/IV) oxide (MnO x )‐coated media, but this approach typically relies on chemical reagents for surface regeneration. In systems lacking chemical storage, dosing, and containment capacity, this may be impractical. This study demonstrated an alternative regeneration technique using an electrochemical reactor for in situ oxidant production at conditions relevant to drinking water treatment. The reactor generated oxidants, likely free chlorine, and increased the pH of the applied water. Across batch‐scale recirculating, intermittent regeneration, and single‐pass continuous regeneration experiments, electrochemically regenerated MnO x ‐coated media produced ~90% removal of Mn(II), achieving a common treatment goal of 0.02 mg/L. Regeneration was also confirmed by analyzing the average oxidation state of the MnO x surface. Performance depended on several factors, such as raw water Mn, applied voltage, and alkalinity. Although modeling and Mn fractionation suggested limited homogenous oxidation of Mn(II), the formation of some colloidal MnO x may have confounded results in some experimental situations. These findings highlight a promising, reagent‐free strategy for regenerating oxide‐coated media, expanding its applicability for water treatment, especially in isolated systems and point‐of‐use applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it