MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414792402 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.231

P05.26.B FLUOROPHORE ABUNDANCE VERSUS HISTOLOGICAL CELLULARITY IN FLUORESCENCE-GUIDED GLIOMA SURGERY

2025· article· en· W4414792402 on OpenAlexaff
Nora Maren Kiolbassa, D. J. G. Black, Walter Stummer, Eric Suero Molina

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaFluorophoreCellProtoporphyrin IXAnaplastic astrocytomaFluorescenceAstrocytomaGliosarcoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse infiltration of malignant glioma cells into surrounding brain tissue complicates maximal safe resection. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) enhances tumor visualization via protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence, but its relationship to cell density remains unclear. We investigate whether PpIX fluorescence correlates with histological cellularity in glioma tissues. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed 243 brain tumor biopsies from patients administered with 5-ALA. Ex vivo hyperspectral imaging captured fluorescence spectra, and a spectral unmixing algorithm quantified abundances of nine fluorophores, including PpIX. Cell density was measured from histopathological slides using an automated cell counting algorithm involving image segmentation and morphological filtering. We focused on glioblastoma samples (n=209) to control for tissue-type variability. For comparison, other tumor types included anaplastic astrocytoma (n=10), gliosarcoma (n=9), metastasis (n=5), and radiation necrosis (n=10). Using linear and quadratic models, we assessed correlations between fluorophore abundances and cell density. RESULTS In glioblastoma samples, weak but statistically significant positive correlations were found between cell density and fluorescence from PpIX634 (R=0.387, p<0.001) and collagen (R=0.403, p<0.001), with collagen showing a slightly stronger correlation. No strong correlation was observed between PpIX fluorescence intensity and cell density across all tumor types (R²=0.17, p<0.001). Quadratic models marginally improved the correlation (R²=0.28) but risked overfitting. Tissue type significantly influenced cellularity and fluorophore abundance (p<0.05), suggesting that factors beyond cell density affect PpIX accumulation. Glioblastoma samples exhibited higher PpIX fluorescence despite lower cell densities than other tumor types, indicating PpIX accumulation in the extracellular matrix or higher intracellular accumulation per cell. CONCLUSION PpIX fluorescence correlates weakly with tumor cell density, suggesting accumulation in the extracellular matrix rather than within tumor cells or higher intracellular accumulation per cell. Collagen fluorescence shows a stronger correlation and may serve as an additional intraoperative biomarker. While PpIX aids tumor visualization, it does not directly reflect cell density. Incorporating biomarkers like collagen fluorescence could enhance tumor delineation and improve surgical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→