MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414793152 · doi:10.1103/b24h-v7by

Efficiently Driving <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> Molecular Motor in Experiment by Suppressing Nonequilibrium Variation

2025· article· lv· W4414793152 on OpenAlexafffund
Takahide Mishima, Deepak Gupta, Yohei Nakayama, W. Callum Wareham, Takumi Ohyama, David A. Sivak, Shoichi Toyabe

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsMolecular motorDissipationWork (physics)Energy (signal processing)Kinetic energyChemical energyClamp

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

F_{1}-ATPase (F_{1}) is central to cellular energy transduction. Forcibly rotated by another motor F_{o}, F_{1} catalyzes adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis by converting mechanical work into chemical free energy stored in the molecule ATP. The details of how F_{o} drives F_{1} are not fully understood; however, evaluating efficient ways to rotate F_{1} could provide fruitful insights into this driving since there is a selective pressure to improve efficiency. Here, we show that rotating F_{1} with an angle clamp is significantly more efficient than a constant torque. Our experiments, combined with theory and simulation, indicate that the angle clamp significantly suppresses the nonequilibrium variation that contributes to the futile dissipation of input work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207