MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414797485 · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ae0f6c

Fractional magnetization plateaus in the Shastry–Sutherland lattice material Er<sub>2</sub>Be<sub>2</sub>GeO<sub>7</sub>

2025· article· en· W4414797485 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Pula, S. Sharma, J. Gautreau, K. P. Sajilesh, Amit Kanigel, Clarina dela Cruz, Tristan N. Dolling, Lucy Clark, G. M. Luke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFMcMaster University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMagnetizationMagnetismFerromagnetismLattice (music)Magnetic hysteresisSaturation (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The experimental study of magnetism on the Shastry–Sutherland lattice (SSL) has been ongoing for more than two decades, following the discovery of the first SSL material SrCu 2 (BO 3 ) 2 . However, investigation of SSL systems is often complicated by the requirements of high magnetic fields (e.g. <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 20 T for SrCu 2 (BO 3 ) 2 ) or the presence of itinerant electrons (e.g. REB 4 ). In this paper, we present the magnetic properties of the SSL material Er 2 Be 2 GeO 7 . Like SrCu 2 (BO 3 ) 2 , Er 2 Be 2 GeO 7 exhibits fractional magnetization plateaus. However, unlike SrCu 2 (BO 3 ) 2 , Er 2 Be 2 GeO 7 exhibits long-range order below <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> K, and the plateaus are accessible using commercial laboratory equipment, occurring for fields <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 1 T. The fractions of magnetization present are closest to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of the saturation magnetization. Hysteresis is observed in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> plateau phases. The lack of itinerant electrons, chemical disorder, and the low fields required to access the fractional magnetization plateaus promise Er 2 Be 2 GeO 7 as a prime candidate for the study of frustrated magnetism on the SSL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207