MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414799661 · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5c08130

Efficient Heavy Metals Detection in Plants: A Microfluidic Approach Combined with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

2025· article· en· W4414799661 on OpenAlexaff
Haotian Yang, Shijie Zhang, Yuanxin Wan, Yujie Shi, Xiaochan Wang, Guo Zhao, Xiande Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaJiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund
KeywordsMicrofluidicsHeavy metalsLaser-induced breakdown spectroscopyDetection limitFilter (signal processing)Filter paperSpectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of heavy metals (HMs) in plants is essential for ensuring the health of both plants and humans. Nevertheless, existing detection techniques are limited by high costs and their potential to damage plant samples. In this paper, a wearable paper-based microfluidic sap enrichment (PMSE) device combined with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is presented. Colorimetric analysis was employed to optimize critical parameters of the HM-enrichment filter paper, including its diameter and pore size, ensuring efficient and uniform HM accumulation. The CuNPs-modified filter paper effectively enriched HMs and enhanced LIBS signals, enabling the detection of Cd(II) and Pb(II) in cucumber plants across a concentration range of 0-150 ppb. The method achieved detection limits of 3 ppb for Cd(II) and 5 ppb for Pb(II). This study provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the rapid detection of heavy metals in plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207