Lam-Tung relation breaking effects and weak dipole moments at lepton colliders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The breaking of the Lam-Tung relation in the Drell-Yan process at the LHC exhibits a long-standing tension with the Standard Model (SM) prediction at O ( α s 3 ) accuracy. This tension could be explained by weak dipole interactions of leptons and quarks, associated with the Z -boson within the framework of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). In this paper, we propose to cross-check these weak dipole interactions by measuring the violation effects of the Lam-Tung relation at future lepton colliders through the processes e + e − → Z γ → ℓ ℓ ¯ γ and e + e − → Z γ → q q ¯ γ . By considering different decay modes of the Z -boson, these channels exhibit distinct sensitivities to various dipole operators, providing a way to disentangle their individual effects. Additionally, the high flavor-tagging efficiencies at lepton colliders could provide strong constraints on the dipole interactions of heavy quarks, such as b and c quarks, which are challenging to probe in the Drell-Yan process at the LHC due to the suppression of parton distribution functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".