MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414801115 · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2025.10.001

Revisiting the oxygen fugacity of martian meteorites: implications for the redox history of the mantle of Mars

2025· article· en· W4414801115 on OpenAlexafffund
C. D. K. Herd, S. Benaroya

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMartianMars Exploration ProgramMineral redox bufferMeteoriteMantle (geology)Fugacity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide an updated compilation of oxygen fugacity (fO 2 ) estimates for martian meteorites, with a specific focus on the shergottites. The compilation includes estimates from over 70 distinct lithologies from the martian meteorite suite, calculated from olivine-pyroxene-spinel and Fe-Ti oxide oxybarometers. Olivine-pyroxene-spinel oxybarometry was recalculated from original data sources using an updated model. Results from V- in-olivine and Eu/Gd oxybarometry from the literature are provided for comparison. Oxygen fugacity data are plotted against chondrite-normalized La/Yb ratio to critically examine the correlation between fO 2 and incompatible trace element (ITE) enrichment previously postulated. We find that the correlation holds, when factors including differences in petrogenetic histories, distinctions between shergottite petrologic types, and early vs. late crystallizing assemblages, are taken into consideration. We model the degassing of H, C and S species from primitive martian magmas using the MAGEC model ( Sun and Lee, 2022 ) and successfully reproduce the 2–3 log unit increase recorded within olivine-phyric shergottites between early and late crystallizing assemblages. We find that volatile degassing can account for most of the fO 2 increase in the olivine-phyric shergottites, without requiring extensive auto-oxidation, as long as their fO 2 remains at or below a value equivalent to the fayalite-magnetite-quartz (FMQ) equilibrium throughout their crystallization. With these considerations in mind, we propose a martian mantle redox-ITE trend defined by shergottite sources: a depleted source (La/Yb ∼ 0.1) with fO 2 = FMQ-4 ± 0.7, an intermediate source (La/Yb ∼ 0.5) at fO 2 = FMQ-3 ± 0.75 and an enriched source (Lab/Yb ∼ 1) at fO 2 = FMQ-2 ± 0.75. The depleted/reduced source is likely graphite saturated. Comparisons with compilations of f O 2 from basaltic eruptives on Earth highlight fundamental differences between the two planets ultimately attributable to differences in degree of mantle convective mixing throughout their histories: terrestrial mantle sources produce basaltic eruptives with a relatively limited range of f O 2 , within ±1 log unit of FMQ; any degassing from these magmas results in reduction, not oxidation. The mantle sources of the shergottites – while represented by a similarly limited range of f O 2 , ∼FMQ-4 to FMQ-2 – produce basaltic eruptives with a range of low initial (magmatic) f O 2 ; the more reduced nature of these magmas make them more susceptible to overprinting by degassing of H-C-S species during eruption and emplacement. Whether the mantle sources inferred from the shergottites apply to other martian meteorites (or other martian igneous rocks) remains to be tested; however, post-magma ocean crystallization processes would have acted to oxidize and overprint initial mantle sources defined by the shergottite f O 2 -ITE trend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochimica et Cosmochimica ActaSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207