Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment considérer le corps en situation muséale par rapport au droit commun? Comment est‑il possible qu’il puisse faire l’objet de patrimonialisation ou plus exactement qu’il puisse être juridiquement approprié par une personne publique, à l’instar d’un musée, et tomber ainsi dans le patrimoine commun en tant qu’élément de la domanialité publique? Cette domanialité, qui implique l’inaliénabilité (entre autres) et qui protège les biens de la collectivité, parmi lesquels les objets muséaux, s’applique‑t‑elle en toutes circonstances, de manière stricte et absolue? Peut‑elle céder, en certaines situations, tout particulièrement lorsqu’il s’agit d’éléments du corps humain dont la nature est si particulière? Ce sont là autant de questions auxquelles cet article tente de répondre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".