MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414808086 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.138693

In-context learning for nano-PCM thermal behavior prediction in battery thermal management via Lattice Boltzmann simulation

2025· article· en· W4414808086 on OpenAlexaff
Bichen Shang, Li Guo, Weijie Sun, Liwei Zhang, Guanzhe Cui, Jiyuan Tu, Xiang Fang, Xueren Li

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermalNusselt numberBoltzmann machineKey (lock)Lattice Boltzmann methodsHeat transferMean squared errorFocus (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring the safety and performance of lithium ion batteries in electric vehicles. While nano-enhanced phase change materials (nano-PCMs) offer excellent thermal regulation, their effectiveness is often limited by localized heat accu mulation from natural convection. Existing ML-based studies mostly focus on temperature metrics alone, neglecting thermal uniformity and relying on black-box models with limited interpretability. This study proposed a zonal nanoparticle distribution strategy and uti lized high-fidelity Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) simulations to investigate underlying heat transfer mechanisms in nano-enhanced PCM systems. The state-of-the-art Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN) was then employed to accurately predict key thermal indicators and was benchmarked against widely used models such as BPNNs, XGBoost, and CatBoost. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to in terpret TabPFN outputs, revealing key regional features and providing physical insights into system performance. The results demonstrated that with optimal non-uniform nanoparticle distribution pattern, the Nusselt number increased by 12.04% and melting time was reduced by 13.05%. TabPFN exhibited superior prediction accuracy compared to other popular ma chine learning models, with error bins generally lower in magnitude and reductions in MAE and RMSE by 8-92% and 7-90%. SHAP analysis further visualized quantitative correlation between training inputs and target variables and their influence on convective behavior and heat retention. The proposed explainable in-context learning framework based on TabPFN and SHAP is expected to provide valuable insights for guiding the design and optimization of advanced nano-PCM battery thermal management systems. • LBM analysis of convection-driven PCM behavior in BTMS motivates a zonal nanoparticle strategy • Batch LBM simulations on nano-PCM cases show 12.04% increase in Nusselt number with stratified nanoparticle design • An explainable surrogate framework combining ML models and SHAP is developed for multi-output prediction • TabPFN outperforms BPNN, XGBoost, and CatBoost with up to 92% reduction in MAE • SHAP analysis identifies as the dominant factor influencing BTMS performance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergySame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207