MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414813924 · doi:10.2196/70553

Unpacking Genomic Biomarkers for Programmed Cell Death Receptor-1 Immunotherapy Success in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Deep Neural Networks: Quantitative Study

2025· article· en· W4414813924 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rayan Mubarak, Fahim Islam Anik, Nazmus Sakib

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunotherapyLung cancerCancer immunotherapyBiomarkerGeneCancerPD-L1Cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. Programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy has shown results in the treatment of NSCLC; however, not all patients respond effectively to it. Identifying predictive biomarkers for PD-1 therapy response is critical to improving patient outcomes and treatment strategies. Traditional methods of biomarker discovery often fall short in terms of accuracy and comprehensiveness. Recent advancements in deep learning provide a powerful approach to analyze complex genomic data to resolve this issue. Objective: This study aims to leverage deep neural networks (DNNs) to identify genomic biomarkers predictive of patient responses to PD-1 immunotherapy in NSCLC. DeepImmunoGene is a model designed using a reduced feature set to identify the most critical biomarkers. We use feature selection to reduce the space and apply deep learning to identify the highly predictive gene subset. Methods: Differentially expressed genes were identified in RNA-seq data from 355 patients with NSCLC using the LIMMA package in R, followed by preprocessing with log2 transformation, removing outliers, and detecting easily identified genes. Machine learning models, including support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and DNNs, were applied to gene expression data to predict patient responses to immunotherapy. Key predictive genes were identified through model interpretation techniques, and differences in model performance were assessed for statistical significance. Primarily, the metric used identifies which genes serve as key biomarkers in regard to immunotherapy detection. Results: Initially, we identified 1093 differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data of 355 patients. We then trained models using SVM, XGBoost, and DNN to predict immunotherapy response. The DNN model outperformed both SVM and XGBoost with an accuracy of 82%, an area under the curve of 90%, and recall of 85%. To identify key biomarkers, we performed a permutation importance analysis, narrowing down the gene set to 98 genes. DeepImmunoGene, trained on these 98 genes, showed superior results, with an accuracy of 87% and an area under the curve of 95%. The top 36 upregulated genes in responders and 62 upregulated genes in nonresponders were identified, which could serve as potential biomarkers for predicting response to PD-1 inhibitors. These findings suggest that DeepImmunoGene can reliably forecast immunotherapy outcomes and aid in biomarker discovery, supporting the development of more personalized treatment strategies in NSCLC. Conclusions: The DeepImmunoGene predictive model identified 36 upregulated genes that may represent candidate genomic biomarkers associated with response to PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Notably, the 10 most significant genes offer valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of treatment responses. These biomarkers may not only aid in predicting which patients are more likely to respond to PD-1 immunotherapy but also offer insights into the molecular differences associated with nonresponse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Bioinformatics and BiotechnologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207