MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414816822 · doi:10.63887/jtie.2025.1.4.6

Recent Advances in Non-Precious Metal Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Fuel Cells

2025· article· en· W4414816822 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Technology Innovation and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellOxygen reduction reactionFuel cellsCatalysisCathodeOxygen reductionTransition metalCarbon fibers

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is the key reaction at the cathode of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), but its slow kinetics severely limit cell efficiency and commercialization. Currently, platinum-based catalysts serve as the benchmark for ORR, yet their high cost, scarcity, and susceptibility to poisoning restrict widespread application. Therefore, developing high-performance, low-cost non-precious metal catalysts (NPMCs) has become a core focus in fuel cell research. This review summarizes recent advances in NPMCs for ORR, highlighting transition metal-nitrogen-carbon (M-N-C, M=Fe, Co, Mn, etc.) materials, heteroatom-doped carbon materials, and transition metal oxides, sulfides, and nitrides. The article discusses synthesis strategies, structural features, active site identification, and performance evaluation of these catalysts. Furthermore, challenges related to activity, stability, and scalability are analyzed, and future research directions are proposed to accelerate the practical application of NPMCs in next-generation fuel cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Technology Innovation and Engineering→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→