MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414817447 · doi:10.1515/rne-2025-0034

Evaluating Railroad Duopoly Behavior: A Market Level Analysis

2025· article· en· W4414817447 on OpenAlexaff
James Nolan, Chi‐Wei Su, Longhai Li

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Network Economics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAgricultural Marketing Service
KeywordsDuopolyCournot competitionOligopolyMonopolyCompetition (biology)Market powerMarket structureMode choice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Railroads remain a critical transportation mode for the movement of U.S. agricultural freight. Within much of the northwest and mid-central U.S., rail is often the only viable mode to transport bulky agricultural commodities, including wheat. With the potential for exploitation of market power by railroads over such movements, regulations exist that are designed to mitigate the effects of monopoly railroad situations. But what of duopoly railroad markets? Economic theory offers reliable predictions of firm behavior when there are either many firms serving a market, or conversely when there is just a single firm serving the market. But behavioral predictions are not as straightforward when evaluating oligopolistic market structures. Relevant to this research, it is not clear a priori what kind of firm and market behavior might emerge under a duopoly. Clarifying what happens in such cases ultimately becomes an empirical issue. In this paper, we investigate a significant U.S. wheat transportation market currently served by a Class 1 railroad duopoly, but railroad behavior in this market may also be moderated by intermodal competition from water barge. While our findings about railroad behavior over time indicate a tendency towards Cournot duopoly behavior, latent variable analysis offers a more granular understanding of how both intra- and inter-modal competition affect the chosen transportation market. With only a very limited number of Class 1 railroads left serving the entire country, the future of U.S. freight transportation by rail will be comprised of numerous important products and regions served by only one or two railroads. While some of the methods we use in this analysis are novel to the industrial economics literature, we believe this effort will help better inform future regulatory policy design for rail, further strengthening market vigilance for freight shippers who are destined to transport goods in increasingly concentrated railroad markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Network EconomicsSame topicTransport and Economic PoliciesFrench-language works237,207