MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414826330 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/ar2z4

Protocol of a scoping review.You've Got A Friend In Me: A Scoping Review on How Personality Traits in Adult Dairy Cows Affects Social Enrichment Response. OSF

2024· review· en· W4414826330 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Xu, Célia Julliot, E. Vasseur, Marjorie Cellier, Nadège Aigueperse

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig Five personality traitsPersonalityProtocol (science)Affect (linguistics)Social support

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OSF

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.078
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.108
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0780.108
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.012
Bibliometrics0.0140.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies→French-language works237,207→