MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414830699 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf300.681

PSIX-26 Performance and body composition of early-maturing Zebu heifers under different supplementation levels on pasture during pre-puberty.

2025· article· en· W4414830699 on OpenAlexaff
Lucas Coelho, Pedro Mota Veiga, Edênio Detmann, Márcio de Souza Duarte, Cláudia Batista Sampaio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsCargill (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebuWeight gainIce calvingPastureRumpArtificial inseminationCorpus luteumInseminationGrazing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Genetic selection and nutritional management have advanced puberty onset in Zebu cattle, enabling first calving at two years. To achieve this, heifers must reach 55–60% of their adult body weight (BW) in the peri-pubertal period. Nutrition influences weight gain rate and through neuroendocrine modulation. Achieving the target weight is essential; however, in grazing systems, the weight gain rate can vary. This study evaluated supplementation levels during the dry season on the performance and body composition of Nellore heifers. A total of 44 heifers (298 days average age) were evaluated over seven months: a four-month of growing phase, a one-month follicular evaluation to assess corpus luteum presence, and a two-month of reproductive phase, during which heifers underwent fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). During the growing phase, heifers received one of four treatments: a control group (ad libitum mineral mix) or supplementation at 3, 6, or 9 g/kg BW (330 g crude protein (CP)/kg dry matter). The 6 g/kg level met 100% of CP requirements to growth, while the 3 and 9 g/kg levels provided 50% and 150%, respectively. After this phase, all heifers received the same nutritional management. BW and carcass traits, including Longissimus dorsi rib-eye area (REA) and subcutaneous fat thickness at the rib (SFTrib) and rump (SFTrump), were measured at the end of the growing, follicular evaluation, and reproductive phases. Data were analyzed using a completely randomized design with the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (version 9.4), adopting a 5% significance level. A linear effect (P = 0.01) was observed for BW, average daily gain (ADG), REA, SFTrib, and SFTrump. At the end of the growing phase, heifers supplemented at 6 and 9 g/kg BW had greater BW (P = 0.001). All groups reached the target BW before the reproductive phase, with greater weight in the 6 and 9 g/kg groups (P < 0.001). By the end of the reproductive period, heifers supplemented at 3, 6, and 9 g/kg exhibited similar BW (P = 0.007). A significant interaction (P < 0.001) between supplementation and ADG showed that heifers receiving 9 g/kg BW had the highest ADG during the growing (P < 0.001) and follicular (P = 0.001) phases but the lowest at the end of the reproductive phase (P < 0.001). No corpus luteum was detected during the follicular evaluation. Final pregnancy rates were 17%, 53%, 81%, and 50% for the control, 3, 6, and 9 g/kg BW groups, respectively. Despite all groups reaching the target BW before reproduction, differences in conception rates and fetal losses suggest that a steady weight gain, with corresponding body composition modifications, enhances productive and reproductive performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→