MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414831062 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf300.605

PSXIII-11 A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy of exogenous fiber enzymes in modulating growth performances and nutrient digestibility in weanling pigs.

2025· article· en· W4414831062 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence E. Cheng, Jiali Chen, Min Wang, Ming Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeanlingNutrientDry matterFiberNeutral Detergent FiberFeed conversion ratioCellulaseDigestion (alchemy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dietary fiber is an anti-nutritive factor that reduces nutrient digestibility, profitability and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions in swine production. Exogenous fiber enzymes have been used in the swine industry for over two decades, but their efficacy in modulating growth performance and nutrient digestibility in weanling pigs remains inconsistent. We hypothesized no significant differences in the in vivo efficacy endpoints in responses to exogenous fiber enzyme supplementation. This study conducted a meta-analysis of 35 studies (2003–2024) to examine the effects of exogenous fiber enzyme supplementation on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in weanling pigs fed commercial diets containing oil meals, cereal grains, by-products and co-products. Results showed no differences (P >0.05) between non-enzyme and enzyme-supplemented groups in initial body weight (7.91±0.35 vs. 7.68±0.28 kg) and dietary contents (as-fed) of net energy (2463±63 vs. 2462±63 kcal/kg), crude fat (7.98±2.72 vs. 8.12±2.73%), neutral-detergent fiber (NDF) (12.16±0.77 vs. 13.14±0.85%) and lignin (0.82±0.23 vs. 0.84±0.28%). Supplementation of exogenous fiber enzymes of cellulases and hemi-cellulases in single and/or in combination had no effects (P >0.05) on growth performance indicators of average daily gain, feed intake, and gain-to-feed ratio. Apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter (82.8±0.8 vs. 83.3±0.9%), NDF (53.5±2.3 vs. 55.6±2.5%) and crude fat (69.2±8.8 vs. 70.3±9.3%) remained unchanged (P >0.05). Our meta-analysis results suggest that currently available commercial exogenous fiber enzymes have limited efficacy for improving growth performances and nutrient digestibility in weanling pigs. More efficacious exogenous fiber enzymes or their modifications need to be further developed to improve profitability and sustainability in swine production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.025
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→