MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414833247 · doi:10.1386/public_00243_1

Queer Toronto on Cable: Rescuing, Remediating, and Reactivating This Show May Be Offenstive to Heterosexuals (1978-1979)

2025· article· en· W4414833247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerObsolescenceLesbianBlueprintHuman sexualityPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the groundbreaking screening of the first episode of This Show May Be Offensive to Heterosexuals , a Toronto-based lesbian and gay cable access show produced and aired from 1978 to 1979, at the Global Audiovisual Archiving Conference held at TIFF Lightbox on July 12-14, 2024. In particular, this article asks the following questions: How do we reactivate incomplete audiovisual archival archives that hold important yet neglected local queer histories? How can the recovery of media objects now considered obsolete help counter the presupposed obsolescence of the histories they contain? The author argues that the remediation and reactivation of underrepresented audiovisual archives, namely archives of forgotten media objects created by and for LGBTQ2+ communities, enable contemporary viewers to reckon with queer history’s complexities while providing blueprints for current political interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it