MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414836448 · doi:10.15562/bmj.v14i2.5653

Combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and systemic corticosteroid versus corticosteroid monotherapy in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) patients: a systematic review

2025· article· en· W4414836448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harlim Charity, Ketut Kwartantaya Winaya, Ago Harlim

Bibliographic record

VenueBali Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorticosteroidAdverse effectMucocutaneous zoneMeta-analysisDiseaseCohortCohort studyCombination therapyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/qU2IS7W1tIw Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is a severe, acute mucocutaneous disorder primarily triggered by medications, marked by significant morbidity and mortality. Despite improved supportive care, therapeutic management of SJS remains controversial due to inconsistent evidence regarding the optimal immunomodulatory approach. Systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are commonly employed treatments, either individually or in combination, yet consensus on their comparative efficacy and safety is lacking. This systematic review aims to clarify the clinical effectiveness and safety of combining IVIG with systemic corticosteroids compared to corticosteroid monotherapy in patients with SJS. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, utilizing electronic databases. The databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. Included studies are clinical trials on SJS, SJS-TEN, and TENS. All studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Result: Of the 385 studies in the initial search, only eight cohort studies were eligible for this review, representing the analysis of 481 patients worldwide. Disease severity was primarily assessed using the SCORTEN (Severity of Illness Score for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis) system in most studies, with mean and median SCORTEN scores ranging from 1.63 to 3. Combination therapy was associated with trends toward lower mortality, significantly faster disease resolution, and shorter hospitalisation time across multiple studies. Combination therapy arrests disease progression earlier, potentially reducing the total dose of corticosteroid needed. All studies reported adverse events and complications, including infections and IVIG-related adverse events (such as fever and chills). Conclusion: The combination of IVIg and corticosteroids may offer superior advantages in terms of increased survival benefits compared to corticosteroid monotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBali Medical JournalSame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207