MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414842024 · doi:10.1029/2025gl116647

Seismic Evidence for Widespread Active Magmatism in Eastern Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica

2025· article· en· W4414842024 on OpenAlexaff
Erica M. Lucas, A. Nyblade, Douglas A. Wiens, R. C. Aster, T. J. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVolcanoInduced seismicityMagmatismTectonicsMountVolcanologyAntarctic ice sheet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Marie Byrd Land is a volcanically active province that overlaps with the Amundsen Sea Embayment, a region of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet that is experiencing particularly rapid ice mass loss. We locate 34 previously undetected seismic events ( M L 1.2–3.2) and identify 251 additional similar events from 2019 to 2024 in eastern Marie Byrd Land. Located at crustal depths and of magmatic or tectonic origin, these events significantly expand the known geographic extent of such seismicity in West Antarctica. Seismicity is primarily located at Mount Takahe, ∼25 km south of the Crary Mountains, and ∼50 km west of the Kohler Range. Long‐period earthquakes at Mount Takahe have seismic characteristics consistent with active magmatic transport at crustal depths beneath the volcano. Glacio‐volcanic feedback due to ongoing ice mass loss may increase eruption frequency from active Marie Byrd Land volcanic systems, possibly perturbing future ice mass loss rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→