MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414843316 · doi:10.3389/frym.2025.1642553

Kids and Researchers Team up to Tackle Pain

2025· article· en· W4414843316 on OpenAlex
Jennifer Stinson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers for Young Minds · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsSickKids Foundation
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Arthritis NetworkNational Institutes of HealthArthritis SocietyPlastic Surgery Foundation
KeywordsActive listeningChronic painEveryday lifeWork (physics)Health carePain management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pain usually goes away after an injury, but for some children and teens, it lasts much longer. This kind of ongoing pain, called chronic pain, can make everyday life difficult. For many years, doctors did not have good ways to recognize or treat chronic pain in young people. Dr. Jennifer Stinson has worked to change that by listening carefully to what young people say about their pain and partnering with them to design better tools and treatments. She helped create tools like PainSCAN , Teens Taking Charge , and iCanCope , to make it easier for kids and teens to get the care they need. Her work has also helped train healthcare providers across Canada and beyond. Today, young people with chronic pain are not just patients—they are shaping the future of healthcare, thanks to leaders like Dr. Stinson who recognized that their voices matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it