MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414843324 · doi:10.53625/jabdi.v4i8.9328

PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DESA WISATA PAMPANG SAMARINDA MENUJU DESA WISATA BERKELANJUTAN

2025· article· id· W4414843324 on OpenAlexaff
Olivia Febrianty Ngabito, Fulkha Tajri M, Sherlia Sherlia, Wahyu Agung Firmansyah

Bibliographic record

VenueJ-ABDI Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarketing management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Wisata Pampang Samarinda Menuju Desa Wisata Berkelanjutan bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kapasitas masyarakat Desa Pampang dalam produksi kerajinan berbasis budaya Dayak, manajemen usaha, dan pemasaran digital, sehingga dapat mendukung pengembangan desa sebagai destinasi wisata berkelanjutan. Kegiatan ini mencakup serangkaian pelatihan dan pendampingan yang melibatkan Kelompok Sadar Wisata (Pokdarwis) serta warga Desa Pampang, dengan dukungan mahasiswa dan tim pengabdian dari Institut Teknologi Kalimantan. Tahapan utama kegiatan ini terdiri dari identifikasi kebutuhan masyarakat, penyusunan strategi pengembangan desa, persiapan pelatihan, pelaksanaan pelatihan produk dan pemasaran digital, serta evaluasi keberlanjutan program. Hasil kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini menunjukkan peningkatan keterampilan warga dalam pembuatan merchandise berbahan resin yang khas dengan budaya Dayak, serta penggunaan media sosial sebagai sarana promosi. Program ini diharapkan mampu meningkatkan pendapatan masyarakat lokal, menarik lebih banyak wisatawan, dan mendukung pelestarian budaya Dayak. Dampak positif dari kegiatan ini meliputi penguatan identitas budaya lokal dan kontribusi dalam pengembangan desa Pampang sebagai destinasi wisata budaya yang menarik dan berkelanjutan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJ-ABDI Jurnal Pengabdian kepada MasyarakatSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207