MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414845934 · doi:10.1038/s41398-025-03562-6

Mapping human brain cell type origin and diseases through single-cell transcriptomics

2025· review· en· W4414845934 on OpenAlexaff
Anjana Soorajkumar, Bipin Balan, Nasna Nassir, Hosneara Akter, Zaha Shahin, Bakhrom K. Berdiev, Marc Woodbury‐Smith, Reem Khalil, Babacar Cisse, Hani T. S. Benamer, Mohammed Uddin

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Psychiatry · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityGenome Canada
FundersMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health SciencesAl Jalila Foundation
KeywordsHuman brainCell typeDiseaseFunction (biology)NeurogenesisTranscriptomeBrain functionCognitionNeural stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human brain, a pinnacle of biological complexity, comprises a diverse array of cell types that regulate cognition and maintain neural homeostasis. Advances in single-cell transcriptomics have revolutionized neuroscience by enabling high-resolution molecular profiling, revealing unprecedented insights into cellular heterogeneity, lineage dynamics, and disease-associated states. Large-scale brain-mapping initiatives have identified numerous novel cell types, yet their functional roles in health and disease remain poorly understood. This review synthesizes current knowledge of brain cell diversity, from neurogenesis to pathological states, and highlights key gene markers that define cellular identity and function. By integrating insights from single-cell transcriptomics, we explore how cellular diversity shapes brain function and contributes to disease mechanisms, providing a foundation for future research and translational applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational PsychiatrySame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207