MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural behaviour of precast prestressed H-shaped ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) pile with steel spliced joint

2025· article· en· W4414851442 on OpenAlexafffund
Erfan Zandi Lak, Fatemeh Valikhah, Sreekanta Das, Philip Loh

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsChrysler (Canada)University of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsPrecast concreteJoint (building)PilePrestressed concretespliceBridge (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Issues related to pile driving, prestressing of concrete piles, and exposure to environmental conditions in steel and concrete piles negatively affect the service life of bridges. This has prompted interest in finding alternative materials for pile foundations to achieve a minimum 75-year service life with minimal maintenance. Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is a promising candidate due to its exceptional strength and durability properties, offering potential improvements in drivability, and structural and geotechnical performances of the piles. In this study, a precast prestressed UHPC pile with a new geometry was investigated and its bending and shear strengths were evaluated through experimental tests. Additionally, the moment-curvature relationship of this pile under different values of axial compression forces is determined using the fiber technique method. Additionally, this study focused on the splice joints designed for the UHPC pile described above. This study also employed the finite element method (FEM) to evaluate the behavior of piles under direct tensile forces and to assess the performance of piles with different sizes of splices. Findings revealed that the piles in this study provided higher capacity compared to previously tested UHPC piles. Piles exhibited superior performance in terms of crack width control. The maximum shear load and bending moment of all specimens exceeded the values recommended by design guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering StructuresSame topicInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsFrench-language works237,207