MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414852121 · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1636775

Streamlining wearable data integration for EHDS: a case study on advancing healthcare interoperability using Garmin devices and FHIR

2025· article· en· W4414852121 on OpenAlexaff
Somayeh Abedian, Eugene Yesakov, Stanislav Ostrovskiy, Rada Hussein

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Digital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteroperabilityBridging (networking)Wearable computerData integrationHealth careSystem integrationWearable technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patient-Generated Health Data (PGHD) collected through wearable devices such as smartwatches offers new opportunities for personalized care, chronic disease management, and preventive health. Despite this potential, technical, regulatory, and interoperability challenges still limit the integration of PGHD into healthcare systems, especially in relation to standards such as Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and the European Health Data Space (EHDS). Methods: This study used the Garmin Vívoactive 4 smartwatch to collect PGHD and integrate it into a FHIR server via the Fitrockr hub and API. The Kodjin FHIR server was deployed to enable standardized data storage and transfer. In parallel, data from the Modular Open Research Platform (MORE) were examined for compatibility with FHIR resources. The process included device enrolment, data collection, mapping to FHIR specifications, and evaluation of compliance with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements. Results: The prototype demonstrated that data from Garmin devices could be securely collected, mapped, and transferred into a FHIR environment. Integration through the Fitrockr hub ensured structured data formatting and reliability. The analysis of PGHD from the MORE platform confirmed that heterogeneous data types, including physiological measures and survey responses, could be represented with appropriate FHIR resources. These findings highlight the technical feasibility and scalability of PGHD integration. Discussion: The results confirm that PGHD from wearable devices can be standardized and transferred into healthcare systems in compliance with international standards and European regulations. This approach contributes to bridging the gap between personal health data and medical decision-making, supporting the objectives of the EHDS and enabling further use of PGHD in research and innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Digital HealthSame topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207